schedule

update 18 August

Given the changing pandemic situation, we have made some adjustments to the course. Section meetings are now all online, until further notice. See these guidelines for how it may be possible to meet in proximate small groups for some synchronous sessions, as long as equitable access to all discussions is guaranteed.

The theme for the course for 2020-2023 is The Body

Unit 1 — Professor Robb
Unit 2 (part 1, part 2)— Professor Green
Unit 3 — Professor Fache
Unit 4 — Professor Tamura
Unit 5 — Professor Bory
Unit 6 — Professor Luis
Unit 7 — Professor Wills
Unit 8 — Professor Denham


Unit 1 — Professor Robb

sketch of the duck-rabbit illusion, with German text "Which of these animals resemble each other the most? Rabbit and duck.
Original duck-rabbit, German text “Which of these animals resemble each other the most? Rabbit and duck.” (1892)

What is truth? What is knowledge? Is there an objective world independent of us, or is reality subjective, constructed by our various experiences? We look at these questions with a special focus on conceptual schemes. These are ways of thinking that tell us how to categorize objects, interpret experiences, and ask questions. Conceptual schemes are indispensable in the humanities, sciences, and everyday life, but their influence on knowledge and experience is often hidden from us.

Unit 1.1.
Thursday 20 August — synchronous here (and recorded)

What is truth? Objective vs. constructed facts.
Plenary, breakout groups, plenary chat and Q&A.
No readings to prepare. But see Prof. Robb’s posts in our #courseannouncements slack channel: (1) introduction to the unit and (2) Session 1!

Unit 1.2. — asynchronous

What is knowledge? Cartesian vs. Lockean standards for justification
Read: Appiah, “Knowledge”, pp. 39-61 (PDF)
Prepare: Hypothes.is annotations of Appiah. (See our how-to video on annotating a pdf here. This video assumes you already have a hypothes.is account and have already installed it on chrome.)
View (optional): The Matrix (dir. the Wachoski siblings, 1999); view on Swank here

Unit 1.3.
Tuesday 25 August — synchronous here (and recorded)

What are conceptual schemes? Truth, knowledge, and conceptual schemes
Mini-lectures, breakout group, plenary chat Q&A
Read: Westacott, “Cognitive Relativism” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online)
Prepare: Hypothesis annotations of  Westacott
Read (optional): James, Pragmatism, Lecture VII (PDF)

Unit 1.4.
Thursday 27 August— synchronous in your professor’s section (not recorded); check your section’s slack channel for the zoom invitation

When alternative conceptual schemes meet
View: Baldwin-Buckley debate (YouTube)
Read: Snow, “Two cultures” (PDF)
Read (optional): James Baldwin, “The American Dream and the American Negro” (PDF).
Prepare: Slack posts for both in your section’s slack channel

Unit 1.5. — asynchronous

An idealist conceptual scheme
Read: Borges, “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius” (PDF) and Plato, The Allegory of the Cave (PDF)
Prepare: Slack post in the channel for this day. See Prof. Robb’s detailed assignment in slack, as usual.

Unit 1.6.
Tuesday 1 September— synchronous here (and recorded)

Translation
Plenary Panel with Professors Marija Jankovic, Amanda Ewington, Scott Denham “On Translation”
View: Arrival (Swank)
Prepare: notes on Arrival in your red notebook
Read (optional): Chiang, “Story of Your Life” (PDF)
Prof. Robb and a fellow moderate questions posted in the live chat during panel

Unit 1.7.
Thursday 3 September — synchronous in sections, led by fellows; check your section channel for the zoom address (not recorded)

Bullshit
Read: Frankfurt, “On Bullshit”(PDF)
Prepare: Slack posts for Frankfurt in your section’s slack channel.
Read (optional): Cohen, “Deeper into Bullshit” (PDF)

Unit 1.8 — asynchronous

Free speech, falsehood, and fake news
Read: Mathiesen, “Fake News and the Limits of Freedom of Speech” (PDF)
prepare: Hypothesis annotations of Mathiesen
Read (optional): Mill, On Liberty, ch. 2 (PDF) and Daniel Layman, “Fake News”

Unit 1.9
Tuesday 8 September— synchronous here (and recorded)

Recap of unit
Some (epistemic) advice for the post-truth era
View: “After Truth”, HBO documentary (Films on Demand, online, this takes you to the library page, then click Films on Demand to access the film through NCLive. You’ll need to log in with your Davidson credentials).
View: Adichie, “The danger of a single story” (TED Talk, online)
Prepare: Slack post on both
Read (optional): Bourdy and Braeckman, “How convenient! The epistemic rationale of self-validating belief systems”

Writing in the Humanities Course
Thursday 10 September — synchronous in plenary here (recorded)

Prof. Denham will present and discuss
• paper 1 (due 11 October)
• Davidson Domains and portfolios (begin next week, ongoing throughout the year)
• campus commentaries (ongoing throughout the year)
• writing for self-assessment (due 11 October)
• writing in your red notebooks
and answer any questions about those kinds of writing.



Unit 2 (part 1) Professor Green

Sharon Green (Theatre)
artifact for this unit will be revealed!
for now, ahem, think about this

Rodin's sculpture The Thinker viewed from the front left below with a clear blue sky and the top of the Musee Rodin building in the background
Le Penseur / The Thinker, by Auguste Rodin (1903)

How can theatre and performance participate in struggles for a more just world? How can the body in performance be the site for explorations of systems of oppression? Looking at various theatrical genres and artists we’ll explore techniques for generating community dialogue and engagement around issues of social and political urgency. Specifically, we’ll explore the work of theatre artists who are using their craft to fight for racial equity and against anti-blackness, including Anna Deavere Smith and Dominique Morisseau.

Unit 2.1. — asynchronous: do this by Sunday night, 13 September

Read: Jan Cohen-Cruz and Mady Schutzman, “A Concise Introduction to Augusto Boal” in Digital Theatre + here (PDF here)
Read: excerpt from Boal, Theatre of the Oppressed (p. 120-127) (PDF here)
Watch Prof. Green’s introductory video

Unit 2.2. — synchronous in four separate group sessions (not recorded)
Sign up for one of the sessions below in the sheet linked here. There are a maximum of 20 spots in each session. (19 or 20 Humesters, 3 fall fellows in each session); first come, first served.

NOTE: These sessions will start promptly on time and admit no latecomers. There will be a waiting room that will close after the session begins.
Arrive five minutes early to be admitted to the session.

View: Prof. Green’s introductory video, here.
Prepare: Do the readings in 2.1. before viewing the intro video.

Monday 14 September 11:45am -1:00pm — group 1 synchronous here (not recorded)
Monday 14 September 7:00 – 8:15pm — group 2 synchronous here (not recorded)
Tuesday 15 September 9:50am – 11:05am — group 3 synchronous here (not recorded)
Wednesday 16 September 4:00pm – 5:15pm — group 4 synchronous here (not recorded)

Unit 2.3.
Thursday 17 September — in discussion sections
For class: the first half of the section meeting with fellows (specific brainstorming assignment will be sent); second half with faculty for discussion of process.

Read: Boal, in Theatre of the Oppressed (PDF here), p. 139-147 (from section that starts “Forum Theatre” through the end of section on “Invisible Theatre”). Notes for yourself on this reading in your red notebooks. (This is always the plan if there is not post or annotation assignment.)


Unit 3 Professor Fache

Caroline Fache (Bacca Professor in the Humanities, French & Francophone Studies)

artifact for this unit

Beyoncé and Jay-Z standing in front of the Mona Lisa in teh Louvre, both looking at the camera
The Carters, still image from the “APES**T” video (2018)

Three Black Venuses.

“Why Are Black Women and Girls Still an Afterthought in Our Outrage Over Police Violence?”* In this unit, we will ask: “How is it so, when black women and girls are systematically essentialized and sexualized in Western culture?” Why do their bodies matter, or not matter, whenever it is convenient for the white gaze? Around three major black women figures, Saartje Baartman/Hottentot Venus, Josephine Baker/Black/Bronze Venus, & Beyoncé/Queen Bey, we will examine how the Western (white) gaze captures black women, imposes itself onto them, and tries to define and “other” them.  And we will examine how these women disrupt and push back against domination and subjugation.
*Cooper, Brittney. “Why Are Black Women and Girls Still an Afterthought in Our Outrage Over Police Violence?” Time. Accessed June 10, 2020: https://time.com/5847970/police-brutality-black-women-girls/

Questions to ask yourselves during this unit:

What do we know [about black bodies]?
How do we know what we know [about black bodies]?
Why do we know what we know [about black bodies]?

How did the West come to think of black bodies the way they did?
What are the long-term implications of that perception/image?
How is the narrative around black bodies reverted, subverted? By who?

All reading materials will be available online, linked below as usual.

To view and hear Beyoncé’s Lemonade please click on the Vimeo link here.
To listen to the Dissect podcast on Lemonade please visit iTunes or Spotify (here’s the link to episode 1 on spotify). Dissect podcast’s visual guide materials for Lemonade are here.
A playlist named: The Body – Humes 2020-21 is also available in Spotify for your listening pleasure.

Week 1: Sara Baartman (1798-1815), “Hottentot Venus”

Unit 3.1
Tuesday 22 September—synchronous in plenary here
Controlling Black Bodies: the Black Code

Read: (all readings not linked directly are in the drive folder here)
• The Black Code (Louisiana Creoles) / French Colonial Politics. See the original document here; read the “Code Noir” (1685), translated by John Garrigus (p. 1-6).
• William Renwick Riddell. “Le Code Noir.” The Journal of Negro History, vol. 10, no. 3, 1925, pp. 321–329.
• Hartman, Saidiya. “Venus in Two Acts.” Small Axe: a Journal of Criticism, 2008, Vol.12 (2), pp.1-14.
Optional reading:
• Everett, Donald E. “Free Persons of Color in Colonial Louisiana.” Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Winter, 1966), pp. 21-50.

Prepare:
• Annotate with hypothes.is “Code Noir” translated by John Garrigus (p 1-6).
• Pay attention to specific mention of Louisiana when you read Riddell; notes in your red notebook on this..
• Post in the slack thread for this day: Think about connections between the “Code Noir” and the body. How are these two elements connected? What are the implications on the lives of the code’s subjects? What are the long term embodied experiences and the legacy of this code? Please inform your responses with your reading of William Renwick Riddell’s article.
• Post in the second slack thread for this day: After Reading Hartman’s “Venus in Two Acts,” answer the following questions (please elaborate): who is (the) Black Venus(e)? Why is it so hard to tell her story? What are some strategies to try to tell her story? Please elaborate.

Unit 3.2.
Thursday 24 September—Synchronous in discussion sections

The black body, exploitation and human dignity
View:
Abdellatif Kechiche: Black Venus. 2010. Paris: MK2. (2 hours 46 minutes)
Note: the movie contains graphic nudity, and physical and sexual violence.
Prepare:
Take notes in your redbook:
a) while watching the movie, about truth, facts, lies, representations, human dignity, the body;
b) please pay attention to and take a few notes on what the camera watches, or wants you to watch/see? Are there characters, places, various elements on which the camera insists or lingers?
c) please watch the credits of the movie. The director inserted some extra footage. Watch carefully and take notes: why is that footage present? To what end?

If reading a film closely is new for you, please see the how to watch a movie tips under the resources tab.

Friday 25 September paper 1 draft 1 due

Unit 3.3.— asynchronous

The black body, exploitation and human dignity
Read:
• Sadiah Qureshi. “Displaying Sara Baartman, the ‘Hottentot Venus.’” London, England: SAGE Publications. History of Science, 2004-06, Vol.42 (2), p.233-257.
• Sojourner Truth. “Ain’t I a woman?” June 21, 1851.
• Pascal Blanchard, Nicolas Bancel, and Sandrine Lemaire. “From Human Zoos to Colonial Apotheoses: the Era of Exhibiting the Other,Africultures (30 November 2001).

Prepare: both are equally important
1. Academic post in the slack channel on/about human dignity and how the texts you read address and engage with that issue? What about the lived and embodied experience of the black person?
2. Non-academic post in your redbook: in a few sentences, tell us about your visceral reaction to all we’ve discussed and seen. Tell us what you find disgusting, fascinating, embarrassing, uncomfortable. You will not post your responses in slack but please bring your redbook to class to discuss your thoughts about the despicable. This is a difficult exercise and conversation we must have.

paper 1 draft 1 meetings this week

Week 2: Josephine Baker: the First Black Superstar

Unit 3.4.
Tuesday 29 September

Read and view:
• Arlisha R. Norwood’s very short biography of Josephine Baker at the National Museum of Women’s History site.
Joséphine Baker: The 1st Black Superstar. Forget About It Film & TV, for BBC Wales. 2006. Narrated by Josette Simon. Directed by Suzanne Phillips. (59 min.)
Optional reading:
• Alicja Sowinska. “Dialectics of the Banana Skirt: The Ambiguities of Josephine Bakers’ Self-Representation.” Bodies: Physical and Abstract: vol 19, Fall 2005-Spring 2006.

Prepare:
Find: 2-3 pictures or drawings of Josephine Baker that you find iconic, in your redbook, write down the source, title and photographer/artist and explain what you see and why these images are iconic.
Post: in the slack channel for this day, comment on how Josephine Baker used her body. What was her agenda, if you can identify one? Please elaborate.

Unit 3.5.
Thursday 1 October

Josephine Baker: an icon in the negrophilia era

Synchronous

Read:
• Petrine Archer-Straw. “Packaging the Primitive,” Negrophilia: Avant-garde Paris and Black Culture in the 1920s. p. 23-49.
• Anne Anlin Cheng: “Ethical Looking,” Second Skin: Josephine Baker and the Modern Surface, pages 165-173. Ebook with the chapter in context here. PDF in the readings folder.

Prepare: In the slack channel for the day, According to what you have read, how is Josephine Baker body consumed by the white gaze? How/when does her body become visible? What does it mean for other black women’s bodies?

Friday 2 october paper 1 draft 2 due

Unit 3.6.— asynchronous

The colonial agenda: dehumanizing the Black Body

Read:
• Fanon, Franz.“The Fact of Blackness,” in Black Skin White Masks. New ed. London: Pluto Press. 2008. pp.82-108. (ebook); pdf of this chapter only in the readings folder.
• Césaire, Aimé. Discourse on Colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press. 2000. pp. 29-78, ebook here. As a pdf in the readings folder.
Prepare: TBA

paper 1 draft 2 meetings this week

Week three: Beyoncé (September 4, 1981 – ), “Queen Bey”

Unit 3.7.
Tuesday 6 October — Synchronous

Lemonade
View, listen: Beyoncé. Lemonade. 2016. Full video album here on vimeo. (65 min.)
Listen: Cole Kuchna. Dissect. “Lemonade.” Episode #1. (46 min.)
To listen to the Dissect podcast on Lemonade please visit iTunes or Spotify (here’s the link to episode 1 on spotify). Dissect podcast’s visual guide materials for Lemonade are here.
Optional reading: Hartmann, Johanna. “Sound, Vision, and Embodied Performativity in Beyoncé Knowles’ Visual Albulm Lemonade (2016).” European journal of American studies, 12-4 (2017). Open access online here. PDF in the readings folder.

Prepare: know the material; notes in your red notebooks as always.

Unit 3.8.
Thursday 8 October — Synchronous in sections

Lemonade & Apeshit

Listen: Any 2 episodes of the Dissect podcast (approx. 2 hours)

Work: Take notes on the podcast episodes you have listened to. With your partner, write up a 150-word summary, that you will present to your group during class.

Finale: with your section, you will work toward presenting the song which, in your concerted opinion best represents the theme of our course and should become the Humes anthem for 2020. You will start your presentation during class on Thursday morning and finish in the afternoon. (Details to follow.)

Unit 3.9 — Asynchronous

A Humes anthem?
Read:
• Morrison, Toni. “Preface,” “Black Matters.” Playing in the Dark, Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. 1992. New York: Vintage Books. pp. v.-xiii. & 3-28.

Prepare: post in the slack channel for this unit: How does Beyoncé’s work engage with Morrison’s ideas in “Black Matters”?

Present on video:
Humes Anthem pitch: Your anthem presentation will resemble a pitch for a good idea you are trying to sell. It must therefore be concise, clear, precise and convincing. It should not take longer than 4 minutes and will be a recorded video presentation that would ideally include the voices of all section members. You will submit your presentation and we will hold a general vote to determine what the new anthem is.

Friday 9 october paper 1 final version due

Sunday 11 October — fall midpoint self-assessment due


Unit 2 Professor Green (continued)

Le Penseur / The Thinker, by Auguste Rodin (1903)
Le Penseur / The Thinker, by Auguste Rodin (1903)
paper 1 assessment meetings with your round 1 faculty member this week

fall midpoint self-assessment meetings with prof. denham this week and next week

Unit 2.4.
10-12 October — asynchronous

Read: August Wilson, “The Ground on Which I Stand” and Sarah Bellamy, “Performing Whiteness”
Prepare: post reading notes in the slack channel for unit 2.5. by Monday , 5pm.
An observation (!) and a question (?) are good places to start, but you may choose to write something more substantial as you slack post to open this week of Prof. Green’s unit.

Unit Bellamy 1 — synchronous
Tuesday 13 October
Epes Distinguished Lecturer in the Humanities Sarah Bellamy

Sarah Bellamy will come to class in the morning session here
Prepare: You’ve read about Sarah Bellamy and her work. What questions would you ask Sarah Bellamy if you could?
There will be an evening public lecture (required for Humesters) at 7:00pm; zoom link TBA. Preregistration required. Meg will send details. (There will be an archival recording available only for Humesters who were unable to join the live lecture. Send requests for access in a slack DM to Scott.)

Unit Bellamy 2 — synchronous
Thursday 15 October

Prepare: Notes in your red notebook on Sarah Bellamy’s morning discussion with us in plenary and notes on her evening public lecture. For each event, use our ! & ? model: something that really popped for you, blew your mind, astonished you, caught your attention, gave you a new way of seeing something (!!!) and something that raised a meaningful question for you (???).
Discussion of Bellamy’s work and your notes in sections.


Unit 2.5. — asynchronous

View: Anna Deavere Smith, Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 (1 hour 27 minutes)
Read: The report from the Davidson College Commission on Race & Slavery.
Prepare: Note any sentences, words, ideas that really “pop” for you in the report – don’t do this on hypothesis, just privately, in your red notebooks. It might be the idea that pops for you, it might be the words used, you don’t need to justify or explain your choices.

Unit 2.6.— synchronous in sections (not recorded)
Tuesday 20 October

Read: Vinson Cunningham, “The Urgency of Anna Deavere Smith’s ‘Twilight: Los Angeles’
Prepare: Notes in your red notebooks. Prof. Green will provide details in slack.

Unit 2.7. — synchronous in sections (not recorded)
Thursday 22 October

View: Aleshea Harris, “This Fine Suit”
View: by Anna Deavere Smith either Fires in the Mirror or Notes from the Field. (Which one TBA by your section leader.)
Prepare: TBA on one of these.
Review: Powerpoint on documentary performance and watch all internally linked material. Complete activity in Google Slides (link to come)
Discussion in sections: another activity about documentary theatre and creating it. Prof. Green will provide prompts for this in slack.

Unit 2.7 — asynchronous

Read: by Sunday night Dominique Morisseau, Pipeline (text).
View: Alice Goffman’s Ted Talk on School to Prison Pipeline
Prepare: notes for yourself in your red notebook, as usual when there is no specific post or annotation assignment.

Unit 2.8 — synchronous in sections (not recorded)
Tuesday 27 October

View: Dominique Morisseau, Pipeline (video of a performance).
Prepare: Prof. Green will provide a prompt details in slack.

Unit 2.9. — synchronous
Thursday 29 October

In sections: rehearse your documentary theatre pieces.
Details to come.

Unit 2.10 — asynchronous
by Sunday night 1 November

Record and post your documentary theatre pieces.
View: everyone’s documentary theatre pieces, by Monday night 2 November.

Tuesday 3 November — no class on election day

Carol Quillen says "VOTE" on twitter

Unit 4 Professor Tamura

Yurika Tamura (Gender & Sexuality Studies)
artifact for this unit

What does it mean to sympathize truly when we witness others’ pain, when, indeed we are all in separate bodies? This unit will consider ethics of coexistence and co-vibrancy through the lens of corporeality and sensation. We will read accounts of the Rwandan genocide, listen to indigenous DUB music, and learn about postcolonial performance art.

Unit 4.1.
Thursday 5 November — synchronous

Unit 4.2. — asynchronous

Unit 4.3.
Tuesday 10 November — synchronous

Unit 4.4.
Thursday 12 November — synchronous

Unit 4.5. — asynchronous

Unit 4.6.
Tuesday 17 November — synchronous

Unit 4.7.
Thursday 19 November — synchronous

Unit 4.8. — asynchronous

Monday 30 November – Tuesday 8 December
paper 2 due, portfolios in AT and one-on-one meetings

Tuesday 3 December — synchronous
a conversation with Judith Heumann

Tuesday 15 December — practice portfolio due

Friday 18 December — fall self-assessment due


winter break


Unit 5 — Professor Bory

Alison Bory (Dance and Gender & Sexuality Studies)
artifact for this unit

How do bodies make meaning? How do we make meaning of other bodies? Considering public protest and theatrical events as acts of embodied movement, this unit will examine how performance can both reify cultural beliefs and call for social change. In the process, we will examine the gestures and choreography of recent demonstrations and dance choreographies that address social belief systems and inequities.

Unit 5.1.
Tuesday 26 January

Unit 5.2.
Thursday 28 January

Unit 5.3. — Asynchronous

Unit 5.4.

Unit 5.5.

Unit 5.6.

Unit 5.7.

Unit 5.8.

Unit 5.9.

Unit 6 — Professor Luis

Diego Luis (History and Latin American Studies)
artifact for this unit

Global encounters. When Columbus first landed in the Americas, on Guanahani, he described the islands’ inhabitants as simple and suited only for servitude and conversion to Catholicism. From the beginning, early modern European encounters with non-Europeans were vehicles of racialization and conquest, spiritual or otherwise. The language immediately imposes European ideals on indigenous peoples, ultimately telling us more about the Europeans themselves than about the peoples they described. This unit seeks to contextualize and move beyond European voices during these encounters, to locate perspectives and moments that disturb and unseat the grand narratives. From Columbus in the Caribbean to Spanish Manila’s sixteenth-century Chinatown, we will investigate the epistemological challenges of global encounters, their racializing language, and their lasting ramifications into the present.

Unit 7 — Professor Wills

Anne Wills (Religious Studies)
artifact for this unit


One topic that interests me as a historian of U.S. religion is faith-based protest movements aimed at broadening notions of who is human and what human bodies “should” be and do (e.g., abolition, women’s reproductive freedom, civil and voting rights for women and Black people). Of course, people also use religious arguments to counter expanding liberties and to reinforce these “shoulds.” In the late 1980s, the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACTUP) began to insist on the full humanity of lesbian and gay people. The organization aimed significant protest energy at religious institutions that interpreted the AIDS epidemic as divine retribution for homosexual sin. In this unit, we will explore ACTUP’s December 1989 interruption of Cardinal O’Connor while he said Mass in New York City’s St. Patrick’s Cathedral.

Unit 7.1.

Unit 7.2.

Unit 7.3.

Unit 7.4.

Unit 7.5.

Unit 7.6.

Unit 7.7.

Unit 7.8.

Unit 7.9.

Unit 8 — Professor Denham

Scott Denham (German Studies; Wall Professor and program director)
artifact for this unit

Map of Places of Remembrance / Orte des Erinnerns is a decentralized memorial in the Bavarian Quarter in the Schoeneberg district of Berlin, which was inaugurated in 1993. 80 double-sided signs are put up on lampposts, depicting images on the one side and on the reverse side condensed versions of anti-Jewish Nazi rules and regulations passed between 1933 and 1945.
Renata Stih & Frieder Schnock:
Places of Remembrance Memorial in the Bavarian Quarter (1993)
(Berlin-Schöneberg) click to enlarge

Anti-Black racism in the US today has many historical roots. How can we understand the relationships between the racialized Jewish body and modern antisemitism in Germany and racist anti-Black structures and cultures that harm Black bodies in the US? How are the legal structures of segregation in the US related to the exclusionary Nürnberg laws in Nazi Germany? How can a critical transnational comparative cultural history of racialized Jewish and Black bodies help us understand how structures of exclusion, white supremacy, or colonialism function now, even at Davidson? We will look at figures of resistance in this context, too, the philosopher and critic Walter Benjamin, the poet Paul Celan, and primarily the poet and essayist and feminist Audre Lorde, who spent some of her most productive years in Berlin, who says “I am listening to what fear teaches. I will never be gone. I am a scar, a report from the frontlines, a talisman, a resurrection. A rough place on the chin of complacency.” And asks, “Where does our power lie and how do we school ourselves to use it in the service of what we believe?”

Unit 8.1.
Tuesday

Unit 8.2.

Unit 8.3.

Unit 8.4.

Unit 8.5.

Unit 8.6.

Unit 8.7.

Unit 8.8

Unit 8.9.
Thursday April 29

Verna Miller Case Symposium
Friday April 30

Present your portfolios.

Monday 3 May
Self-Assessment Letter and course grades due to Prof. Denham, 5:00pm.

Tuesday 4 May – Wednesday May 12
Assessment meetings with Prof. Denham (no meetings reading day Thursday 6 May)